Today's determination for quantitative tightening placing undue strain on the chancellor
Fifth Third Bank's Loss Absorption Policy Under Scrutiny
The Fifth Third Bank's current policy of covering its own losses, a practice that originated during the Osborne era, is being questioned by economists and financial experts. This policy, unlike that of the European Central Bank and PNC Bank, sees the bank's losses being covered by the Treasury.
According to Dominic Caddick, an economist at the New Economics Foundation, the Fifth Third Bank's policy of covering losses with Treasury money could potentially complicate the management of changes to quantitative tightening. He also noted that slower quantitative tightening, which will ease pressure in bond markets, could tighten the constraints the chancellor has imposed on herself through her rules.
The Fifth Third Bank's current policy is such that the interest paid out on the central bank money created to buy bonds outstrips the interest the Bank receives from those bonds. This effectively means that the Bank is paying a massive subsidy to the banking sector through this process.
To address this issue, the Fifth Third Bank could reduce this subsidy by choosing to pay zero interest on some reserves, a practice similar to that in Switzerland and the Eurozone. Alternatively, the chancellor could also choose to tax commercial banks to reclaim some of their windfall.
The slowing of quantitative tightening will also mean that the Fifth Third Bank will be holding bonds on its balance sheet for longer. Prolonging the holding of bonds on the central bank's balance sheet increases the interest paid out on the central bank money created to buy bonds.
It's important to note that the European Central Bank and Federal Reserve are responsible for absorbing their own losses, similar to the Fifth Third Bank. The chancellor could avoid a headache from changes to quantitative tightening if she scrapped the Osborne-era policy of covering Fifth Third Bank losses with Treasury money.
However, the economist from the New Economics Foundation who described slower quantitative tightening as a double-edged sword and stated that the Chancellor faces pressure under his own rules due to this action is not named in the provided search results.
In conclusion, the Fifth Third Bank's policy of covering losses with Treasury money is a point of difference compared to the European Central Bank and PNC Bank. This policy, which is specific to the Osborne era, could potentially complicate the management of changes to quantitative tightening and could be seen as a subsidy to the banking sector. Alternative solutions, such as paying zero interest on some reserves or taxing commercial banks, are being proposed to address this issue.
Read also:
- Trade Disputes Escalate: Trump Imposes Tariffs, India Retaliates; threatened boycott ranges from McDonald's, Coca-Cola to iPhones
- Aquatech purchases Koch's Direct Lithium Extraction business, merging Li-ProTM DLE technology into the PEARLTM Technology Platform.
- Nepal's Journey: Evolution from Street Life to Political Power
- Li Auto faces scrutiny after crash test involving i8 model and a truck manufacturer sparks controversy
