London Stock Exchange Group's CEO Pay Sparks Shareholder Uprising
London's Stock Exchange Group experiences a shareholder uprising due to CEO's £2.7 million salary increase
A third of shareholders at the London Stock Exchange Group's (LSEG) annual general meeting (AGM) have revolted against plans to hike the pay of CEO David Schwimmer, from £5.1million to £7.8million this year. This rebellion comes in the face of a strong Q1 performance, where the company reported a 7.8% increase in first-quarter income to £2.3billion, with its markets division seeing impressive 13.5% growth[1][3].
A Raised Brow Over Executive Compensation
Despite the solid financial results, shareholders refused to be swayed by the proposed pay hike. The primary reason appears to be discontent with the substantial increase in CEO compensation, especially amidst operational challenges, such as a decline in the equity business[1][3]. The vocal shareholders argue that compensating leadership during underperformance is misplaced and could have negative ramifications for the company's long-term success[1][3].
Bandies Eyebrows on Value Alignment
Adding fuel to the flames, investors question the strategic fit between Schwimmer's performance metrics and the organizational outcomes[3]. In particular, the CEO's bonus, which equates to 70% of the maximum potential (300% of base salary), is seen as unjustified, given the group's reliance on non-equity revenue streams, such as data and derivatives[1][3]. This disjunction raises concerns among investors about whether LSEG is catering to its core equity market or focusing on other, more profitable areas[3].
Icy Stares at Widening Executive Pay Gap
The backlash at LSEG is also part of a broader trend in the UK, where executive pay has risen more quickly than US counterparts, leading to increased scrutiny of remuneration committees[5]. The vote demonstrates that disgruntled shareholders are starting to balk at rewards disconnected from specific business-unit outcomes[1][3][5]. The board has acknowledged the dissent and pledged to hold further talks with shareholders[1].
Although the resolution passed, the rebellion indicates a growing impatience among investors with executive pay and performance, not only at LSEG but across the broader financial landscape[1][3][5].
Relevant Articles
- Previous
- 1
- Next
- UK exports in worst slump since Covid: Bank of England...
- Hackers hold-up at M&S: Silicon Valley has failed miserably...
Share This Article
HOW THIS IS MONEY CAN HELP
- Learn More: Discover the best (and cheapest) stocks and shares Isa and the right DIY investing account.
DIY INVESTING PLATFORMS
Learn More, Learn More: Determine which platform to partner with by visiting AJ Bell, Hargreaves Lansdown, and interactive investor, respectively.
Learn More, Learn More: Explore further investing opportunities with InvestEngine and Trading 212.
Affiliate links: This is not a sponsored post. If you take out a product through the links provided, This is Money may earn a commission, but this will not impact the editorial independence.
Compare the best investing account for you
- Shareholders at the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) have revolted against plans to increase CEO David Schwimmer's pay, highlighting concerns about executive compensation during underperformance and its potential negative impact on the company's long-term success.
- The investors' discontent is centered on the substantial pay hike, the strategic fit between Schwimmer's performance metrics and organizational outcomes, and the CEO's bonus, which is seen as misplaced given the group's reliance on non-equity revenue streams.
- The backlash at LSEG is part of a broader trend in the UK, where executive pay has risen more quickly than US counterparts, leading to increased scrutiny of remuneration committees.
- The board has acknowledged the dissent and pledged to hold further talks with shareholders, suggesting a growing impatience among investors with executive pay and performance not only at LSEG but across the broader financial landscape.
- This episode underlines the importance of investors carefully considering their stocks, investing strategies, and business decisions, as even high-performing companies like LSEG may face shareholder uprisings due to perceived disconnects between executive pay and performance.
