Investment pressure on financial institutions supporting fossil fuel companies: is it losing its impact?
======================================================================================
In the face of growing investor pressure and mounting climate concerns, European banks continue to finance coal-related activities through companies like Glencore, despite having policies in place for a coal phase-out. This trend has sparked calls for implementation plans from banks that have set targets to reduce fossil fuel financing.
Recent developments have shown that banks are facing hurdles in their efforts to adopt more climate-friendly practices. For instance, Royal Bank of Canada has walked away from its earlier target to fund C$500bn in sustainable projects by 2025, citing growing regulatory pressures. Similarly, Bank of America has filed two no action requests with the SEC this year against climate-related proposals.
During this year's proxy season, investors have faced challenges in pushing banks towards a greener future. Regulatory headwinds and dwindling shareholder support for climate resolutions have made the task more arduous.
The main reasons for bankers' resistance to reducing fossil fuel financing and increasing renewable financing are rooted in financial risk and return concerns, complexity and transition challenges, reliance on fossil fuel expansion, weak and non-binding regulations, regulatory uncertainty and regional disparity, and investor pressure vs. market realities.
Empirical evidence suggests that greener investments do not necessarily yield competitive returns under current market conditions, making bankers wary of committing heavily to renewables if expected profitability or stability is uncertain. The energy transition is also seen as a complicated process that cannot happen overnight, with fossil fuel projects representing long-lived infrastructure and established business models.
Many banks continue to back fossil fuel expansion and infrastructure, viewing them as core economic activities with predictable returns. This ongoing financing "locks in" emissions and hinders renewable investment growth. Current disclosure requirements and pledges to reduce fossil fuel financing are seen as insufficient, with banks often self-regulating until stricter, binding regulations are implemented, especially at the global level.
Without comprehensive global rules, banks may hesitate to reduce fossil financing in markets where competitors do not, fearing loss of earnings or market share. Market sentiment alone does not guarantee greener financial practices if profitability and risk-return profiles are unfavorable.
Despite these challenges, some investors have been successful in making their voices heard. The Church of England Pensions Board, with £3.4bn of funds under management, attended a meeting and called for a full exit from fossil fuel financing while acknowledging the bank's progress. At the Barclays AGM on May 7, investors also made their voices heard.
Reports such as the 2024 Banking on Climate Chaos report provide crucial evidence that investors base their thinking on. Sara Taaffe, responsible investment analyst for the environment at the Church of England Pensions Board, stated that banks have an important role in catalysing the transition to net zero.
Amanda Mackenzie, chair of Lloyds Bank's responsible business committee, reaffirmed that climate and nature remain key to the bank's strategy at the AGM. However, the 'Say on Climate' vote at Royal Bank of Canada was opposed by over 80% of shareholders, indicating a lack of support for stricter climate-related measures.
The pressure on banks to reduce fossil fuel financing and tilt their loan books to renewables is back during the current proxy season. Several North American banks have departed the Net Zero Banking Alliance, which recently voted to abandon its 1.5°C target for its members. HSBC, Standard Chartered, and Barclays have coal policies in place, but general financing is not covered by these policies.
As the world moves towards a more sustainable future, the role of banks in financing this transition cannot be overstated. Despite the challenges, it is clear that investors and stakeholders will continue to push for change, advocating for banks to play a more active role in catalysing the transition to net zero.
- The calls for implementation plans from banks aiming to reduce fossil fuel financing demonstrate the importance of environmental science in the context of climate-change, as they seek to adopt more climate-friendly practices in their businesses.
- The reluctance of bankers to increase renewable financing can be linked to the investment sector, as they perceive greener investments as presenting financial risks and uncertainties, which may affect their profits and returns.
- The pressure on banks to reduce fossil fuel financing and tilt their loan books to renewables indicates a shift in the business landscape, where finance plays a critical role in shaping the economy's transition towards a more sustainable future.
