Dodd-Frank regulatory deadlines have been overlooked in three out of four instances thus far
The Dodd-Frank Act, a landmark financial regulatory reform law enacted since the Great Depression, has seen significant progress but also encountered numerous challenges in its implementation.
Since 2011, regulators have faced a myriad of hurdles in meeting the Act's deadlines. Complex technical and operational challenges, ongoing litigation, evolving regulatory priorities, and intricate reporting and compliance requirements have contributed to the delays.
One of the key reasons for the missed deadlines is the complexity of the law. For instance, swap data reporting to swap data repositories (SDRs) has proven to be a challenging task due to poorly defined data fields and the need for extensive corrections and consultations.
Legal challenges and reversals have also played a significant role in delaying the implementation. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) open banking rules under Section 1033 of Dodd-Frank were finalized only recently but immediately faced lawsuits from banking trade groups. This led to the CFPB reversing its support for the rule and seeking to vacate it, causing delays and uncertainty in implementation.
Despite these challenges, progress has been made. Regulators have established frameworks around mortgage lending and credit reporting consistent with Dodd-Frank mandates, promoting consumer protections and clearer disclosure rules. Large banks have been required to submit "living wills" for orderly resolution in case of failure, enhancing system resilience as mandated under Dodd-Frank.
The CFPB, under the leadership of Richard Cordray, who was appointed as director by President Obama in January 2011, will soon begin supervision of nonbank firms, including mortgage servicers, payday lenders, and student loan companies. The exact date for the commencement of supervision is yet to be announced.
It is important to note that the implementation of the Act has not been without controversy. GOP Senators, including Cory Gardner (R-CO), have asked the Obama administration to stop issuing non-emergency rules and regulations in the final month of his term.
As the Act continues to be implemented, it remains a work in progress, with regulators refining rules and responding to stakeholder feedback and judicial scrutiny to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. However, the breadth and complexity of the law, coupled with ongoing litigation and evolving agency priorities, will likely continue to present challenges in the future.
References: 1. [Source 1] 2. [Source 2] 3. [Source 3] 4. [Source 4] 5. [Source 5]
- The ongoing implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act has been influenced by several factors, including politics, business, finance, and general-news areas such as the GOP Senate's criticism and the litigation faced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) from banking trade groups.
- The complexity of the Dodd-Frank Act, along with challenges in meeting deadlines and resolving legal issues, has led to intricate reporting and compliance requirements in the field of business and finance, making it a continuous work in progress under the CFPB's supervision, particularly with the upcoming regulation of nonbank firms.
