Demand for Reimbursement: Nations Seek Compensation for Tax Revenue Losses Before International Summit

"Tax Fairness Matters": German States Demand Equal Compensation for Financial Losses in Upcoming Federal Meetings

Countries demand compensation for tax evasion cases ahead of Summit meeting - Demand for Reimbursement: Nations Seek Compensation for Tax Revenue Losses Before International Summit

Let's dive into the latest financial tussle between the federal government and states, seeking clarity on the proposed tax relief for businesses, dubbed the "investment booster."

Critics argue that this plan could bring significant financial losses to the states and municipalities, potentially amounting to a hefty 30 billion euros by 2029. And, rightfully so, they're calling for fair compensation.

Hendrik Wüst, a crucial figure in the Coalition Agreement, expressed his concerns, stating that it wouldn't be right to blindside states and municipalities during the third year of the recession with this package. The so-called "nexus principle," agreed upon in the coalition treaty between the Union and SPD, clearly stipulates that the level of government responsible for a decision should also finance it, including instances of reduced revenues.

Now, let's meet some key players in this high-stakes game:

1. Baden-Württemberg's Minister-President, Winfried Kretschmann (Greens): He insists that the federal government should compensate the states for any financial losses, stating that it's not fair to ask states to bear the cost of new debts with them.
2. Federal Minister of Labor and Social Affairs, Lars Klingbeil: Klingbeil acknowledged the states' demands but didn't promise a definitive resolution this week. However, he did hint at a substantial investment program.
3. North Rhine-Westphalia's deputy head of government, Mona Neubaur (Greens): Neubaur called for the federal government to meet the states halfway, threatening potential resistance in the Bundesrat if necessary.
4. The German Association of Towns and Municipalities: They're advocating for direct federal aid to compensate municipalities for tax losses, suggesting temporarily reducing the trade tax equalization for immediate relief and eventually demanding a higher share of value-added tax or income tax revenue in the long term.

Similarly, the German Association of Counties supports the idea of temporary trade tax equalization reductions to cover expected municipal tax losses. They also demand an appropriate offset for these losses.

The Left Party, on the other hand, opposes the planned tax relief for businesses, claiming it will not benefit the economy in the foreseeable future, and instead only enrich the super-rich. They call for a "stop sign" on these one-sided tax reliefs at the expense of states and municipalities. The conflict highlights the delicate balance between federal investment and the financial stability of states and municipalities.

• High-level meeting
• Potential financial losses
• Investment booster
• Hendrik Wüst
• Federal government
• CDU
• SPD
• Lars Klingbeil
• Düsseldorf
• Rheinische Post
• Coalition agreement
• Bundesrat
• Municipality
• Berlin

1. The current debate revolves around the proposed "investment booster" for businesses, with critics concerned it could lead to potential financial losses of up to 30 billion euros by 2029, particularly for states and municipalities.
2. Key figures like Hendrik Wüst and Winfried Kretschmann, among others, are advocating for equal compensation from the federal government to offset these losses, emphasizing the importance of the 'nexus principle' where responsible parties finance their decisions.

Read also: