Can the High-Speed 2 (HS2) project be salvaged from its current predicament?

The Shocking Mess That Is HS2: A Step-by-Step Disaster

Can the High-Speed 2 (HS2) project be salvaged from its current predicament?

For anyone familiar with the HS2 debacle, the transport secretary's scathing assessment on Wednesday won't come as a shock. Heidi Alexander's "appalling mess" label sums up the situation perfectly - there's "no route" to delivering the controversial project on time and within budget.

The costs have soared over £100bn, and the latest delay, pushing the completion date beyond 2033, is just one in a long line of schedule adjustments. The litany of issues culminating in this predicament is simply too vast to list in one go, ranging from disastrous management by executives and politicians, to one-sided contracts, and even outright fraud.

Two damning reports released concurrently arrived at the same conclusion: the current state of HS2 is "unacceptable," and the only way to salvage any benefit from the project is a full reset. But is that even possible? James Stewart's review contends that poor-value contracts negotiated between HS2 Ltd and its suppliers are the most significant contributors to the overall cost increases.

This assessment comes just a few months after the outgoing CEO of a major project contractor poured cold water on suggestions that any of the deals could be renegotiated. Euston, the high-speed line's terminus, remains undecided despite governments' wildly optimistic claims of success.

Investigations Into Fraud Allegations

Most now accept the irreversible damage has been done. Construction began prematurely without a proper plan, while cost and schedule estimates were overly optimistic from the outset, according to Mark Wild, the new CEO tasked with righting the ship.

Buried in Wild's letter to the transport secretary is a telling admission: he's considering reducing the speed of the high-speed line's trains to "allow for more certainty around cost." However, whispers of a fraud and cover-up persist, with cost forecasts possibly being downplayed from the start, making the current mess inevitable.

In response to these claims, the government has signaled it's taking these allegations more seriously. Alexander said allegations of fraud in parts of the supply chain "need to be investigated rapidly and vigorously," adding, "If fraud is proven, the consequences will be felt by all involved."

Holding those responsible accountable may provide some respite, but it won't address the project's underlying issues. Moreover, public outcry has escalated to such a degree that politicians from various sides, including Nigel Farage, Greg Smith, and the Labour peer Lord Berkeley, called for HS2's termination entirely on Wednesday.

"We will reset our relationship with government to establish alignment and enable successful delivery," wrote Wild. But that's a mammoth task.

Enrichment Data:

Overall:The current investigations into fraud allegations and cost manipulations in the HS2 project have gained momentum with serious claims concerning the supply chain and contract management:

• The UK Transport Secretary, Heidi Alexander, has initiated a ministerial investigation after allegations surfaced that parts of the HS2 supply chain have been defrauding taxpayers, including submitting fake payslips to disguise self-employed workers as employees to evade taxes. HS2 Ltd conducted its own investigation starting last year and subsequently referred a subcontractor case to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for further examination. One subcontractor involved supplied workers to Balfour Beatty Vinci, a main HS2 contractor, though the primary contractor itself is not implicated in wrongdoing. Another supplier, the Danny Sullivan Group, has been suspended from new contracts pending investigation completion[1][2][3].
• The Transport Secretary has pledged a full, rapid, and vigorous investigation with prosecution assured if fraud is proven. She has emphasized a reset of the project’s oversight and cost controls, including reducing financial delegations to HS2 Ltd and imposing cost-saving incentives in supplier contracts, aiming to regain taxpayer confidence. Mike Brown, former Transport for London commissioner, has been appointed chair of HS2 Ltd to help turn around delivery and manage the overhaul[1].
• Parallel to the official probe, concerns were raised by Lord Berkeley, a Labour peer, who criticized the Cabinet Office for previously dismissing warnings about widespread financial mismanagement and potential fraud since the project’s inception. He accused ministers of misleading Parliament on HS2’s true costs and urged an inquiry into potential breaches of the ministerial code. His warnings date back to 2019, focusing on cost overruns far exceeding the £55 billion figure officially cited[2].
• The investigation covers not only the fraud allegations within the supply chain but also a broader cultural and capability overhaul following the independent James Stewart review, which the Transport Secretary accepted in full. A revised budget and completion timetable for HS2 are expected by late autumn, after what will be the second major project reset in five years[1].

In summary, ongoing investigations into HS2 target systemic fraud claims related to contractor payroll practices, significant cost inflation due to management failures, and potential deception of Parliament over the true project budget. The government has taken steps to strengthen oversight, pursue legal action where appropriate, and reset the project’s governance to control spiraling costs and restore public trust[1][2][3].

1. The investigations into fraud allegations in the HS2 project have expanded, with the UK Transport Secretary initiating a probe into suspected fraudulent activities within the supply chain, including the submission of fake payroll documents to evade taxes, as well as considering a cultural and capability overhaul following the James Stewart review.
2. Amidst the ongoing investigations, the potential deception of Parliament over the true costs of HS2, as well as the systemic fraud claims related to contractor payroll practices and significant cost inflation due to management failures, have raised concerns about the project's underlying issues and the need for a complete reset of its governance to control spiraling costs and restore public trust.

Read also: