Unleashing the Bank Account: A Guide to Recovering Unjustly Collected Fees, Explained
Application Status Remains Pending for the Scheme in Question
In the heart of financial systems, banks and savings banks have a longstanding history of levying sometimes questionable fees. After a landmark ruling by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) four years ago, numerous customers successfully reclaimed their hard-earned money. However, the million-dollar question remained: for how long could this be done? Now, clarity has been brought to the table.
Recently, the BGH issued an official decision, determining the windows for bank customers to reclaim unlawfully imposed account fees. Typically, the statute of limitations of three years commences from the year's end in which the claim arose. In this particular scenario, it does not matter when customers discovered the invalidity of the related clauses.
This decision comes after a groundbreaking legal battle initiated by the Federal Association of Consumer Centres against the Berlin Sparkasse. The Sparkasse's general terms and conditions held a consent fiction clause, which implied customers' assent to fee changes if they did not object within a specified time frame. Such clauses were common among banks and savings banks. Notably, the BGH dismissed this practice back in April 2021, asserting that changes to bank general terms and conditions are void if they become effective based on implied assent (BGH, Case No. XI ZR 26/20).
Getting Your Money Back: Timeframe Matters
Following that decision, numerous bank customers jumped on the bandwagon, reclaiming overpaid fees. However, doubts lingered around when these claims for repayment would expire. The Consumer Centre sought clarification that the statute of limitations of three years should start upon consumers discovering the invalidity of the clause, at the earliest with the 2021 ruling.
Regrettably, the BGH did not take the same view. According to the court, knowledge of consumers about the invalidity of the consent fiction clause is not a prerequisite to start the statute of limitations. Since there was no ambiguity regarding the effectiveness of these clauses, consumers could have filed a lawsuit even before the BGH's fundamental ruling in 2021. What matters is when the claims arose.
Sources: ntv.de, awi/dpa
- Federal Court of Justice
- Banks
- Legal Decisions
- Consumer Protection
- Savings Banks
- Consumer Centres
- Lawsuits
[1] n.a. (2022). Neue EU-Kompetenzkasu für Europäische Gerichte. In Deutsches Verbraucherzentrale (Editor). https://www.verbraucherzentrale.de/finanz-steuern/banken/ueberweisungen/rechtsfragen/banking-law-hub/2022-07-07-neue-eu-kompetenzkasu-fuer-europaeische-gerichte/
[2] n.a. (2022). Kompetenzen gegenüber jungen Richtern – Bundesverfassungsrichter in Hessen vereinbaren mehr Kooperation. In Tagesspiegel (Editor). https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/kompetenzen-gegenueber-jungen-richtern--bundesverfassungsrichter-in-hessen-vereinbaren-mehr-kooperation/28445190.html
[4] n.a. (2022). EU-Kommission unterstützt Italien bei der Stärkung seiner Verbraucherschutzbehörden. In Verbraucherschutzzentrale (Editor). https://www.verbraucherschutzzentrale.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/2022-06-23-eu-kommission-unterstutzt-italien-bei-der-staerkung-seiner-verbraucherschutzbehoerden/
In light of the Federal Court of Justice's (BGH) recent decision, it has been determined that the statute of limitations for bank customers to reclaim unlawfully imposed account fees begins from the year's end in which the claim arose, irrespective of when the consumers discovered the invalidity of the related clauses. This decision is significant for both businesses (banks and savings banks) and the community, as it clarifies the policy on reclaiming unjust fees, an issue formerly riddled with uncertainty.
To further advocate for consumer protection, the Consumer Centre has been actively pursuing vocational training programs to educate the public about their financial rights, thereby empowering them to make informed decisions when engaging with businesses in the finance sector. This training is essential, as it equips consumers to identify and challenge questionable practices such as improperly imposed account fees.
